[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness between unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression (ULBD) with unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) and uniportal interlaminar endoscopy (UIE) in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: A clinical data of 52 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, who met the selection criteria and treated with ULBD between March 2021 and November 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. The patients were allocated into UBE group (23 cases) and UIE group (29 cases) according to the surgical methods. There was no significant difference ( P>0.05) in age, gender, body mass index, surgical segment, type of lumbar stenosis, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), disc height, and dural sac area between the two groups. Perioperative indexes (incision length, operation time, hospital stay, and surgical complications), clinical indicators (VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, and ODI before operation and at 3 days, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after operation), and imaging indicators (disc height and dural sac area before operation and at 1, 12 months after operation, and dural sac expansion area) were recorded and compared between the two group. Results: All operations in both groups were successfully completed. Compared with the UIE group, the UBE group had shorter operation time and longer incision length, with significant differences ( P<0.05). But there was no significant difference in hospital stay and incidence of complications between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 12-20 months (mean, 14 months). The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain and ODI after operation significantly improved when compared with preoperative values ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the above indicators between different time points after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at different time points ( P>0.05). Imaging examination showed that there was no significant difference in disc height between the two groups at different time points after operation ( P>0.05). However, the dural sac area and dural sac expansion area were significantly larger in the UBE group than in the UIE group ( P<0.05). Conclusion: ULBD with UBE and UIE can achieve satisfactory effectiveness in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. But the former has more thorough decompression and better dural sac expansion than the latter.

Circ-Ctnnb1 Regulates Neuronal Injury in Spinal Cord Injury through the Wnt/ß-Catenin Signaling Pathway.

STUDY DESIGN: Spinal cord injury (SCI) rat model and cell model were established for in vivo and in vitro experiments. Functional assays were utilized to explore the role of the circRNAs derived from catenin beta 1 (mmu_circ_0001859, circ-Ctnnb1 herein) in regulating neuronal cell viability and apoptosis. Bioinformatics analysis and mechanism experiments were conducted to assess the underlying molecular mechanism of circ-Ctnnb1. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to probe into the biological function of circ-Ctnnb1 in neuronal cells of SCI. METHODS: The rat model of SCI and hypoxia-induced cell model were constructed to examine circ-Ctnnb1 expression in SCI through quantitative reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction. The Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan score was utilized for evaluating the neurological function. Terminal-deoxynucleotidyl transferase mediated nick end labeling assays were performed to assess the apoptosis of neuronal cells. RNase R and actinomycin D were used to treat cells to evaluate the stability of circ-Ctnnb1. RESULTS: Circ-Ctnnb1 was highly expressed in SCI rat models and hypoxia-induced neuronal cells, and its deletion elevated the apoptosis rate of hypoxia-induced neuronal cells. Furthermore, circ-Ctnnb1 activated the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway via sponging mircoRNA-205-5p (miR-205-5p) to upregulate Ctnnb1 and Wnt family member 2B (Wnt2b). CONCLUSION: Circ-Ctnnb1 promotes SCI through regulating Wnt/ß-catenin signaling via modulating the miR-205-5p/Ctnnb1/Wnt2b axis.

Effectiveness and safety of the use of antifibrinolytic agents in total-knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antifibrinolytic agents have been successfully used to reduce blood transfusion demand in patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to investigate different antifibrinolytic agents for patients undergoing total-knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We searched the randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of antifibrinolytic agents on TKA in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Participants are divided into antifibrinolytic agent group and control group under TKA. Double extraction technology is used and the quality of its methodology is evaluated before analysis. Outcomes analyzed included blood loss, number of blood transfusions, rates of blood transfusion, and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). RESULTS: A total of 28 randomized controlled trials involving 1899 patients were included in this study. Compared with the control group, the antifibrinolytic agents group exhibited significantly reduced the amounts of total blood loss (weighted mean difference [WMD] with 95% confidence interval [CI]: -272.19, -338.25 to -206.4), postoperative blood loss (WMD with 95% CI: -102.83, -157.64 to -46.02), average units of blood transfusion (risk ratio with 95% CI: 0.7, 0.12 to 0.24), and average blood transfusion volumes (WMD with 95% CI: -1.34, -1.47 to -1,21). Antifibrinolytic agents significantly reduced the rate of blood transfusions and did not increase the occurrence risk of intraoperative blood loss and DVT. Several limitations should also be acknowledged such as the heterogeneity among the studies. CONCLUSION: The application of antifibrinolytic agents can significantly reduce blood loss and blood transfusion requirements. Additionally, these agents did not increase the risk of DVT in patients undergoing TKAs.

[Detection accuracy of occlusal caries by cone-beam computed tomography images scanned with different parameters].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the detection accuracy of occlusal caries in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images scanned with different scanning parameters. METHODS: Thirty-seven extracted human premolars and molars without restorations or obvious cavities were selected for this study. The teeth 3 or 4 as a group were mounted in 12 plaster blocks and scanned with DCT Pro (VATECH, Co., Ltd., Yongin-Si, S.Korea) at normal and high resolution settings and with ProMax 3D (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) at low, normal and high resolution settings. In addition, the tooth blocks were imaged with the ProMax 3D at three different tube currents. Ten doctoral candidates of Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology evaluated all the images of the tooth blocks using a five-level confident scale. Actual presence and the extent of caries were established by histological examinations. The areas under the ROC curves (Az value) were analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven (29.7%, 11/37) teeth were sound, 13 (35.1%, 13/37) had enamel caries and 13 (35.1%, 13/37) had dentine caries. There were no significant differences between normal resolution and high resolution for DCT Pro on the detection accuracy of occlusal (enamel+dentine) caries (0.698 ± 0.064 vs. 0.735 ± 0.044, P>0.05).No significant differences were found for ProMax 3D among low, normal and high resolution (0.700 ± 0.031 vs. 0.700±0.054 vs. 0.701 ± 0.041, P>0.05). For dentinal caries, there were no significant differences between CBCT images scanned with different resolutions for DCT Pro(0.776 ± 0.078 vs. 0.811 ± 0.047, P>0.05) or ProMax 3D (0.713 ± 0.039 vs. 0.685 ± 0.063 vs. 0.713 ± 0.040, P>0.05). No significant differences were found for enamel caries detection for DCT Pro (0.620 ± 0.068 vs. 0.659 ± 0.048, P>0.05)or ProMax 3D (0.686 ± 0.050 vs. 0.685 ± 0.063 vs. 0.689 ± 0.063, P>0.05). For ProMax 3D, there were no significant differences among different tube currents on the detection accuracy of occlusal caries (0.653 ± 0.065 vs. 0.700 ± 0.054 vs. 0.67 ± 0.062, P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Different resolutions did not have an impact on the detection accuracy of occlusal caries. The tube currents for ProMax 3D did not show any effect on occlusal caries detection.